Most of you with money to invest must decide either to "do it yourself" or hire someone else to decide where the money should go. This process of asset allocation always involves placing (usually) the majority of funds in stocks of companies worldwide. The "best" way to accomplish this is certainly subject to argument and controversy; however there is a significant body of academic and historical study that can help.
Here are a number of relatively well accepted facts:
1) Over long periods of time (10 years and more), stocks outperform bonds and cash.
2) Although there may be some actively managed mutual funds and stock pickers that can outperform the indexes that they invest in, it is doubtful that you or anyone else can identify them in advance. It is much more likely that owning a group of stocks in an index (index fund or equivalent) will outperform and cost less than paying someone to pick the "best ones."
3) Investment success is highly correlated with buying when others sell, and vice versa.
4) The above is very hard to do.
Given this information, what is the investor/advisor to do? The facts support so-called "passive" investing, in which funds are placed into low cost, diversified index funds and occasionally rebalanced. This sounds simple, but is misleading. Although investing in different market segments (American Stocks, Overseas stocks, Natural resources stocks, etc.) is probably done most efficiently with indexing-the investor must make the active choice of how much each asset class must be used at any given time.
For example, over the last two years-the Natural Resources and Commodities, and general Overseas market indexes have markedly outperformed the American stock market. How much of your portfolio should have been in the former categories two years ago? How about now? Of your American stock market investments-how much should be in a total market index instead of some other mixture of small vs. large companies?
The point I'm making is that the process of investing and asset allocation is never simple. One must carefully weigh historical valuations, investor risk tolerance, investor time horizons and have some "feel" for future trends to do a good job. This process is being performed by thousands, if not millions of full time professionals worldwide-and is not a process for amateurs. The financial press doesn't help with its myriad lists of "ten best stocks or funds to own now," as study after study has demonstrated that this type of trend following is doomed to failure.
Certainly, there are reasonable compromises that allow an investor to self invest and have probably decent long term returns. However, even these asset allocations require discipline, investigation and review. There is no short cut to investment success. Paying an expert is certainly reasonable, given that we all do so for help with medical, legal and accounting issues on a regular basis.
Summing up, investing in stock markets involves actively choosing an asset allocation, and then usually using a "passive" vehicle (like an index fund) to invest in each of the different asset classes chosen. Both the initial asset allocation and changes in the future require time, work, knowledge and continued learning.
best-way-2-invest.com provides free stock tips and investment advice. Learn the stock market investing basics to protect your money and investments.
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Revy_Azhary
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment